The Disclosure

Most health arguments end with "according to a study". Almost nobody checks who funded that study, even though industry-funded research reports sponsor-favourable conclusions at several times the rate of independent work. That information is public, printed in the papers, and effectively unreadable at scale.

The Disclosure reads it at scale. It indexes the research behind contested health and nutrition questions, more than 8,000 studies across 50 questions and growing, and makes the money legible.

What it does

• Finds and reads the studies. Papers are pulled from open academic indexes and each one is read once into a structured record: design, sample size, duration, conclusion, funding statement.
• Traces the money. Funder names in all their variations are resolved against a hand-curated registry of about 140 companies, trade bodies and public funders, each classified by independence.
• Scores every study out of 100. A published, rule-based formula covering design, sample size, funding independence and transparency. No model in the scoring loop; every point traceable to a stored fact.

What it refuses to do

It never claims a study is true or false, and it never infers an undisclosed conflict. It reports what is documented, including the absence of documentation, which gets its own tier rather than a pass. It maps the evidence and its funding; it does not tell you who is right.

Status

Live at disclosure.hamzabuilds.tech with the methodology published in full. The code is open source on GitHub.